Int J Biol Sci 2006; 2(2):73-78. doi:10.7150/ijbs.2.73 This issue Cite
Research Paper
1 Department of Biology, Faculty of Natural Scieneces, University of Split, Teslina 12, 21000 Split, Croatia
2 Department of Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, Medical School, University of Split, PAK, Spinčićeva 1, Croatia
A major cytoskeletal and extracellular matrix proteins of the amphioxus notochordal cells and sheath were detected by immunohistochemical techniques. The three-layered amphioxus notochordal sheath strongly expressed fish collagen type I in its outer and middle layers, while in the innermost layer expression did not occur. The amphioxus notochordal sheath was reactive to applied anti-human antibodies for intermediate filament proteins such as cytokeratins, desmin and vimentin, as well as to microtubule components (ß-tubulin), particularly in the area close to the epipharyngeal groove. Alpha-smooth muscle actin was expressed in some notochordal cells and in the area of the notochordal attachment to the sheath. Thus muscular nature of notochordal cells was shown by immunohistochemistry in tissue section. Our results confirm that genes encoding intermediate filament proteins, microtubules and microfilaments are highly conserved during evolution. Collagen type I was proven to be the key extracellular matrix protein that forms the amphioxus notochordal sheath.
Keywords: collagen, intermediate filaments, notochord, notochordal sheath
Early investigations on the amphioxus notochord and its sheath described the notochordal sheath as an envelope completely surrounding the notochord and was considered to be a product of notochordal cells and Müller's tissue [1,2]. For a while, it was believed that it consists of elastic fibres and therefore was called the tunica elastica [3,4]. More recently, [5], the notochordal sheath was described as a very thick connective tissue sheath consisting of collagenous fibres of unusually large diameter and irregular outline, embedded in a slightly granular matrix. Most of the collagen fibres ''followed a spiral course'' [5], but they were also described as circular and longitudinal in orientation [6,7]. Our recent electron microscopic investigations showed the three-layered organization of the notochordal sheath in amphioxus [8]. Two layers (outer and middle layer) consisted of collagen fibres, while the innermost one was amorphous and resembled the basal lamina [8]. That ulrastructural study also indicated the presence of collagen type I in the notochordal sheath of amphioxus.
Although numerous investigations on the notochord of amphioxus were done during the last century, some biochemical features of amphioxus notochordal sheath still remained unclear. Recent investigations on the notochord cells of amphioxus disclosed actin as a major component of the cellular microfilaments: using the EST (expressed sequence tag) analysis, 12 different types of muscle genes were revealed in amphioxus notochord cells [10]. One of these genes encoded neither cytplasmic nor skeletal type of actin, and therefore was marked as the actin specific only for amphioxus notochord [11]. In situ hybridization showed a weak signal of this gene also in somites of the amphioxus neurula [11]. The other cytoskeletal elements, such as the intermediate filaments, were also detected in amphioxus notochord on molecular level [12]. Intermediate filaments (IF) form a major component of the eukaryotic cytoskeleton and have important roles in the function of specialized cell types [13]. The type I and type II IF gene classes both encode keratins expressed predominantly in epithelial cells. The type III IF, including vimentin, desmin, peripherin, and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), are predominantly expressed in mesenchymal cells. Similarly, type IV genes (neurofilaments) are expressed in neurones [13]. The proteins (nuclear lamins) of type V IF genes, function in the nucleus instead of the cytoplasm, forming a structural envelope beneath the nuclear membrane [13]. It was shown that amphioxus genome possesses genes which cover at least 12 different cytoplasmic proteins; three of them were defined as the homologues of the type I and II keratins [12,14]. Until now, neither of these cytoskeletal components was confirmed by immunohistochemistry in tissue sections of amphioxus notochord or in the notochordal sheath. In the present study, we investigated the presence of the cytoskeletal and extracellular matrix elements in tissue sections of amphioxus notochordal cells and notochordal sheath using immunohistochemical techniques.
In the present study, ten adult individuals of amphioxus Branchiostoma lanceolatum L. were utilized. The specimens were collected in the Adriatic sea near Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries, Split, Croatia.
The samples were cut into small pieces (4-6 mm in length) and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate buffer. After dehydration in an ascending series of ethanol, and clearing in xylene, the tissues were embedded in paraffin, sectioned transversally at 4-6 µm and mounted on glass slides [15]. Paraffin sections were deparaffinised in xylene and rehydrated in ethanol and water. The sections were incubated for 30 minutes in 0.1 % H2O2 thus avoiding endogenous peroxidase activity. After washing with phosphate-buffered solution (PBS), the sections were incubated (if necessary) in sodium citrate or ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) buffer for 10 minutes at 95ºC and cooled to room temperature. In order to avoid the background activity, sections were incubated in 10 % normal goat serum for 20 minutes. The sections were incubated with several primary antibodies (Table 1) according to their own protocols. After applying the primary antibodies, the sections were incubated with mouse or rabbit secondary antibody for 30 minutes at room temperature. The sections were then washed in PBS, stained with diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride solution (DAB), and counter-stained with hematoxylin [16-27]. The negative controls were made for each primary antibody by labelling the tissues only with secondary antibody and staining with DAB, thus abolishing the specific staining in amphioxus tissues.
The sections were analysed using an Olympus BX 40 light microscope.
Characteristics of the applied primary antibodies (all monoclonal)
Antibody | host | produced by | cat. number | dilution |
---|---|---|---|---|
Anti-Human Alpha-Smooth Muscle Actin | mouse | DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark | M 0851 | 1:150 |
β-tubulin (D-10) | mouse | Santa Cruz Biotech.,Inc. | sc-5274 | 1:100 |
Anti-Fish Collagen Type I | rabbit | BIODESIGN Int., USA | T8917R | 1:50 |
Anti-Human Cytokeratin MNF116 | mouse | DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark | M 0821 | 1:2200 |
Anti-Human Cytokeratin 7 | mouse | DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark | M 7018 | 1:50 |
Anti-Human Cytokeratin 8 | mouse | DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark | M 631 | 1:50 |
Anti-Human Cytokeratin LP34, 34βE12, 35βH11 | mouse | DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark | N 1589 | 1:50 |
Anti-Human Cytokeratin 20 | mouse | DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark | M 7019 | 1:30 |
Anti-Human Desmin | mouse | DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark | M 0760 | 1:150 |
Anti-Vimentin/HRP | mouse | DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark | U 7034 | 1:3000 |
Anti-Human GFAP | mouse | DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark | M 0761 | 1:60 |
Anti-Human Nestin | mouse | R&D Systems,Inc.,USA | MAB 1259 | 1:30 |
Anti-Human Neurofilament | mouse | DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark | M 0762 | 1:150 |
Antibodies to fish collagen type I, microfilaments, microtubules and intermediate filaments were used in order to elucidate the immunohistochemical characteristics of the notochordal sheath and notochordal cells in the amphioxus Branchiostoma lanceolatum (Table 2). Most of these antibodies labelled the amphioxus tissues, especially in the area of epipharyngeal groove. The negative controls made for each antibody completely abolished the immunoreaction in the tissue. The controls can also be provided by preabsorbtion of the primary antibody with the specific peptide [28].
A strong positivity to anti-fish collagen type I was seen in the outer and middle layer of the notochordal sheath, while no positivity was seen in its innermost layer. Reactive parts of the sheath were stained intensively brown with diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride solution (DAB). Mild staining characterized the notochordal cells and their attachment to the sheath (Figure 1A).
Antibodies to microfilaments (Anti-Human α-Smooth Muscle Actin) and microtubules (β-tubulin D-10)
The amphioxus notochordal sheath showed no positivity to Anti-Human α-Smooth Muscle Actin. Very strong positivity was seen in the notochordal cells and in the area of their attachment to the sheath (Figure 1B).
The outer part of the notochordal sheath showed strong positivity to β-tubulin D-10 in the area of the epipharyngeal groove, where notochordal sheath touches the digestive tube as well (Figure 1C). A mild positivity was seen in the middle part of the sheath, near the neural tube (not shown).
Antibodies to cytokeratins (Cytokeratin MNF 116; Cytokeratin 7; Cytokeratin 8; Cytokeratin LP34, 34ßE12, 35ßH11; Cytokeratin 20)
Positivity to most of these cytokeratins was found in the outer or middle layers of the notochordal sheath in the area of the epipharyngeal groove as well as at the border between notochord and the neural tube (Table 2). Anti-Human Cytokeratin MNF 116 was present predominantly in the outer part of the sheath (Figure 1D), while Anti-Human Cytokeratin 20 was intensively expressed in both, outer and middle part of the sheath (data not shown). Anti-Human Cytokeratin 7 and Anti-Human Cytokeratin LP34, 34ßE12, 35ßH11 were expressed in the middle part of the sheath, while Anti-Human Cytokeratin 8 was expressed in the outer part of the sheath (data not shown). The positivity to cytokeratins on the border between the sheath and the neural tube was weaker then those near epipharyngeal groove. Only Anti-Human Cytokeratin LP34, 34ßE12, 35ßH11 was strongly expressed in the area where the notochordal sheath meets the neural tube (data not shown).
A) Anti-Fish Collagen Type I. (ns) notochordal sheath, (n) notochord. Note strong brown staining of outer part of the notochordal sheath, and absence of staining in its inner part. Mild brown staining characterizes notochordal cells and their attachment to the sheath (arrow). DAB 100x. B) Anti-Human α-Smooth Muscle Actin. (ns) notochordal sheath, (nc) notochordal cell. Strong reactivity to actin observed in the notochordal cells and their attachment to the sheath (arrows). DAB 100x. C) ß-tubulin D-10. (ns) notochordal sheath, (n) notochord, (epg) epipharyngeal groove. Notochordal sheath strongly reacts with ß-tubulin in its outer part, and mildly in its inner part. DAB 100x. D) Anti-Human Cytokeratin MNF 116. (ns) notochordal sheath, (n) notochord, (epg) epipharyngeal groove. Very strong expression of cytokeratin MNF 116 im the outer part of the notochordal sheath. DAB 100x. E) Anti-Human Vimentin. (n) notochord, (ns) notochordal sheath, (epg) epipharyngeal groove. Note strong brown staining of outer part of the notochordal sheath (arrows). DAB, 20x.
Immunoreactivity of the notochord and its sheath to the applied primary antibodies.
Antibody | Notochord | Notochordal attachment to the sheath | outer /middle part of the sheath |
---|---|---|---|
Anti-Fish Collagen Type I | + | + | + + +/+ + + |
Anti-Human Alpha-Smooth Muscle Actin | + + + | + + + | - |
β-tubulin (D-10) | - | - | + + +/+ |
Anti-Human Cytokeratin MNF116 | - | - | + + +/ - |
Anti-Human Cytokeratin 20 | - | - | + + +/+ + + |
Anti-Human Cytokeratin 7 | - | - | - /+ + |
Anti-Human Cytokeratin LP34, 34βE12, 35βH11 | - | - | - /+ + + |
Anti-Human Cytokeratin 8 | - | - | + +/ - |
Anti-Human Desmin | - | - | + + +/+ |
Anti-Vimentin/HRP | - | - | + + +/+ |
Anti-Human GFAP | - | - | - |
Anti-Human Neurofilament | - | - | + + +/ + |
Anti-Human Nestin | - | - | - |
+++ = very strong immunoreactivity, ++ = strong immunoreactivity, + = mild immunoreactivity, - = no immunoreactivity
Antibodies to type III of intermediate filaments (Anti-Human Desmin, Anti-Human Vimentin, Anti-Human GFAP)
In the area of the epipharyngeal groove, the outer layer of the notochordal sheath was very reactive to desmin and vimentin antibodies (Figure 1E). Anti-Vimentin was also expressed in the notochordal sheath, on the border between notochord and neural tube. Anti-GFAP was not expressed in the notochordal sheath.
Antibody to type IV of intermediate filaments (Anti-Human Neurofilament) was also expressed in the outer layer of the sheath in the area of the epipharyngeal groove (data not shown).
Antibody to type VI of intermediate filaments (Anti-Human Nestin) was not expressed neither in notochord nor in the notochordal sheath.
The notochordal sheath resembles the fibrilar net of tissue which encloses the notochord, thus controling its shape and stiffness [29]. It was first described as an elastic sheath called tunica elastica [3,4]. Later on, it was shown that it does not contain elastic fibres, both ultrastructurally and histochemically [8]. The notochordal sheath was also described as a connective tissue structure containing collagen fibres and the layer resembling basal lamina [5]. Three-layered structure of the amphioxus notochordal sheath was only recently described ultrastructurally: the outer and middle layer were made of collagen fibres, while the innermost layer resembled the basal lamina [8]. In the present study we found that the outer and middle layer of the notochordal sheath were both expressing fish collagen type I. Previous studies did not detect any type of collagen directly in tissue section of amphioxus notochordal sheath using immunohistochemical methods. The types of collagen were analysed in the notochordal sheath of amphibian larvae and chicken embryo [9]. Thus, in chick embryo, the notochord was surrounded by collagen identified as type X1(II) and by sulphated glycosaminoglycans [9]. In human embryos, the notochord is transformed from an apparently undifferentiated organ into an organ with secretory activity, producing microfibrils and depositing acid mucopolysaccharides in the notochordal sheath [30].
In the present study, the inner layer of the amphioxus notochordal sheath was of fine granular structure and was not positive to fish collage type I. This could be explained by the fact that the basal lamina in vertebrates contains collagen type IV which is amorphous in structure [31, 32]. The applied alpha smooth-muscle actin antibody was expressed in the area where the sheath was attached to the notochordal cells, as well as in the cytoplasm of some notochordal cells. The actin antibody was derived from human tissues and its expression in the amphioxus tissues confirmed the high preservation of this protein during evolution.
Actins comprise a relatively small family of structural proteins found in all eukaryotes [33]. Cytoplasmic actin is a major component of the cytoskeleton and, thus, has a wide distribution in all types of tissues in organisms from protozoa to mammals [33]. Previous studies confirmed presence of 12 different muscle genes in the amphioxus notochord [10]. To investigate the evolution of developmental mechanisms in chordates, cDNA clones for two amphioxus actin genes, BfCA1 and BfMA1, were isolated [33]. BfCA1 encoded a cytoplasmic actin and was expressed in the amphioxus notochord during larval stage while BfMA1 was a vertebrate-type muscle actin gene and was not detectable in the amphioxus notochord [33]. Considering the antibodies applied to other cytoskeletal components, such as intermediate filaments and microtubules, we found that the notochordal sheath was more or less strongly reactive to all cytokeratins, desmin and vimentin in the area of notochordal sheath close to epipharyngeal groove. Cytokeratins are intermediate filaments usually found in epithelial tissue [20, 32, 34]. The notochordal tissue is also ontogenetically derived from the epithelium of the archenteron [35]. Investigations on molecular level disclosed that genes that determine the type I and II keratins are expressed in the amphioxus tissues [36]. However, data about their immunohistochemical expression in notochord of amphioxus were missing. In immunohistochemical studies on human fetal notochord all of the notochord specimens were positive for CK 8 and CK 19, but none showed a positive immunoreaction for CK 7, or CK 18 [37]. In the present study, the expression of the cytokeratin protein antibodies in the connective tissue structures, such as notochordal sheath could be explained by coexpression of cytokeratins and vimentin in certain cells as previously shown in the notochord of human and mouse embryos [34, 38, 39]. Vimentin is type III intermediate filament found in the mammalian mesenchymal cells and also in other vertebrates, from fish to birds [32, 34, 40]. The expression of desmin antibody (also type III intermediate filament) in the outer layer of the notochordal sheath is similar to those of vimentin. This could be explain by polymerization of vimentin and desmin [31]. ß-tubulin is a main component of the microtubules [32]. The applied antibody to ß-tubulin also showed positivity in the notochordal sheath in the area of the epipharyngeal groove. Precise explanation of reactivity in that specific region to microfilament and microtubular proteins remains to be solved on electron-microscopic level. Obviously, this part of notochordal sheath has a very peculiar structure and composition.
According to the results of our study, we can conclude that the notochordal sheath is connective tissue layer containing collagen type I as a major extracellular matrix protein. The sheath showed also a strong immunoreactivity to most of the applied antibodies to intermediate filaments and microtubules, but exclusively in the area of the epipharyngeal groove. Expression of human smooth muscle actin in some amphioxus notochordal cells and places of their attachment to the notochordal sheath confirms not only the muscular nature of the notochord, but also a high conservation of genes encoding actin protein during evolution.
We thank Mrs Asja Miletić for her skilful technical assistance.
The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists
1. Müller W. Beobachtungen des patologischen Instituts zu Jena. I Ueber den Bau der Chorda dorsalis. Z Naturw. 1871 ;6:327-353
2. Schneider KC. Lehrbuch der vergleichenden Histologie der Tiere. Jena: Verlag von Gustav Fischer. 1902
3. Schneider A. Beitraege zur vergleichenden Anatomie und Entwicklungsgeschichte der Wirbelthiere. Berlin: G Reimer. 1875
4. Ognev SI, Fink N. Zoologija kralješnjaka. Zagreb: Školska knjiga. 1953
5. Flood PR. Fine structure of the notochord of amphioxus. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London. 1975 ;36:81-104
6. Eakin RM, Westfall JA. Fine structure of the notochord of the amphioxus. J Cell Biol. 1962 ;12:646-651
7. Harrison FW, Ruppert EE. Microscopic Anatomy of Invertebrates. New York: Wiley-Liss. 1997
8. Bočina I, Saraga-Babić M. The notochordal sheath in amphioxus - an ultrastructural and histochemical study. Collegium Antropologicum. in press
9. Malacinski GM, Woo Youn B. The structure of the anuran amphibian notochord and re-evaluation of its presumed role in early embryogenesis. Differ. 1982 ;21:13-21
10. Suzuki MM, Satoh N. Genes expressed in the amphioxus notochord revealed by EST analysis. Dev Biol. 2000 ;224:168-177
11. Urano A, Suzuki MM, Zhang P. et al. Expression of muscle-related genes and two MyoD genes during amphioxus notochord development. Evol and Dev. 2003 ;5:447-458
12. Karabinos A, Riemer D, Erber A. et al. Homologues of vertebrate type I, II and III intermediate filament (IF) proteins in an invertebrate: the IF multigene family of the cephalochordate Branchiostoma. FEBS Letters. 1998 ;437:15-18
13. Luke GN, Holland PWH. Amphioxus type I keratin cDNA and the evolution of intermediate filament genes. J Exp Zool. 1999 ;285:50-56
14. Karabinos A, Wang J, Wenzel D. et al. Developmentally controlled expression patterns of intermediate filament proteins in the cephalochordate Branchiostoma. Mechanisms of Development. 2001 ;101:283-288
15. Sheehan DC, Hrapchak BB. Theory and practice of histotechnology. Ohio: Battelle Press. 1980
16. Debus E, Weber K, Osborn M. Monoclonal antibodies specific for glial fibrillary acidic (GFA) protein and for each of the neurofilament triplet polypeptides. Differ. 1983 ;25:193-203
17. Gown AM, Vogel AM. Monoclonal antibodies to human intermediate filament proteins:III. Analysis of tumors. Amer J Clin Pathol. 1985 ;84:413-424
18. Skalli O, Ropraz P, Trzeciak A. et al. A monoclonal antibody against α-smooth muscle actin: A new probe for smooth muscle differentiation. J Cell Biol. 1986 ;103:2787-2796
19. Van Muijen GNP, Ruiter DJ, Warnaar SO. Coexpression of intermediate filament polypeptides in human fetal and adult tissues. Lab Invest. 1987 ;57:359-369
20. Goddard MJ, Wilson B, Grant JW. Comparison of commercially available cytokeratin antibodies in normal and neoplastic adult epithelial and non-epithelial tissues. J Clin Pathol. 1991 ;44:660-663
21. Weintraub H, Davis R, Tapscott S. et al. The myoD gene family: nodal point during specification of the muscle cell lineage. Science. 1991 ;251:761-766
22. Wang PN, Zee S, Zarbo RJ. et al. Coordinate expression of cytokeratins 7 and 20 defines unique subsets of carcinomas. Appl Immunohistochem. 1995 ;22:99-107
23. Kobayashi N, Mundel P. A role of microtubules during the formation of cell processes in neuronal and non-neuronal cells. Cell and Tiss Res. 1998 ;291:163-174
24. Hermanns S, Müller HW. Preservation and detection of lesion-induced collagenous scar in the CNS depend on the method of tissue processing. Brain Research Protocols. 2001 ;7:162-167
25. Moreno N, López JM, Sánchez-Camacho C. et al. Embryonic and larval development of NADPH-diaphorase/ nitric oxide synthase reactivity in the brain of amphibian Pleurodeles waltl. Int J Dev Biol. 2001 ;45:81-82
26. Duncan JE, Warrior R. The cytoplasmic dynein and kinesin motors have interdepedent roles in pattering the Drosophila oocyte. Current Biology. 2002 ;12:1982-1991
27. Lechner A, Leech CA, Abraham EJ. et al. Nestin-positive progenitor cells derived from adult human pancreatic islets of Langerhans contain side population (SP) cells defined by expression of the ABCG2 (BCRP1) ATP-binding cassette transporter. Biochem and Biophys Res Commun. 2002 ;293:670-674
28. Castro A, Becerra M, Manso MJ. et al. Anatomy of the Hesse photoreceptor cell axonal system in the central nervous system of amphioxus. J Comp Neurol. 2006 ;494:54-62
29. Ruppert E, Barnes D. Invertebrate Zoology. New York: Saunders College Publishing. 1994
30. Shinohara H, Tanaka O. Development of the notochord in human embryos: Ultrastructural, histochemical, and immunohistochemical studies. Anat Rec. 1988 ;220:171-178
31. Junqueira LC, Carneiro J, Kelley RO. Osnove histologije. Zagreb: Školska knjiga. 1999
32. Kierszenbaum AL. Histology and cell biology. An introduction to pathology. St. Louis: Mosby Inc. 2002
33. Kusakabe R, Kusakabe T, satoh N. et al. Differential gene expression and intracellular mRNA localization of amphioxus actin isoforms throughout development: Implications for conserved mechanisms of chordate development. Dev Genes Evol. 1997 ;207:203-215
34. Götz W, Kasper M, Fischer G, Herken R. Intermediate filament typing of the human embryonic and fetal notochord. Cell and Tiss Res. 1995 ;280:455- 462
35. Stach T. The ontogeny of the notochord of Branchiostoma lanceolatum. Acta Zool. 1999 ;80:25-33
36. Luke GN, Holland PWH. Amphioxus type I keratin cDNA and the evolution of intermediate filament. J Exp Zool. 1999 ;285:50-56
37. Naka T, Iwamoto Y, Shinohara N. et al. Cytokeratin subtyping in chordomas and the fetal notochord: an immunohistochemical analysis of aberrant expression. Mod Pathol. 1997 ;10:545-551
38. Souza PC, Katz SG. Coexpression of cytokeratin and vimentin in mice trophoblastic giant cells. Tiss and Cell. 2001 ;33:40-45
39. Lehtonen E, Stefanović V, Saraga-Babić M. Changes in expression of intermediate filaments and desmoplakins during development of human notochord. Differ. 1995 ;59:43-49
40. Mücke N, Wedig T, Bürer A. et al. Molecular and biophisical characterization of assembly-starter units of human vimentin. J Mol Biol. 2004 ;340:97-114
Corresponding address:
Ivana Bočina. Department of Biology, Faculty of Natural Scieneces, University of Split, Teslina 12, 21000 Split, Croatia. Tel. 385 21 385 133. Fax: 385 21 385 431. E-mail: bocinahrReceived 2006-2-8
Accepted 2006-3-10
Published 2006-4-10