Int J Biol Sci 2020; 16(5):882-892. doi:10.7150/ijbs.40960 This issue Cite
Research Paper
1. Department of Pathology, Xinxiang Medical University, Henan, China
2. Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Henan, China
3. The Academic Affairs Office, Xinxiang Medical University, Henan, China
* contributed equally to this work.
Casein kinase 1δ (CK1δ) and casein kinase 1ε (CK1ε) have been proposed to be involved in DNA replication, differentiation and apoptosis, thus participating in the regulation of tumorigenesis. However, their functions in colon cancer and the underlying mechanism remain unclear. Here, we found that the expression of CK1ε and CK1δ increased significantly in cancer tissues and the upregulation of CK1ε and CK1δ were closely related to poor differentiation, advanced TNM stage and poor prognosis of colon cancer. CK1δ/ε inhibitor IC261 could induce a decrease in cell survival and proliferation, and an increase in apoptosis in colon cancer cells. Interestingly, IC261 increased the level of aerobic glycolysis in colon cancer cells. Meanwhile, IC261 caused the decrease of p53 protein level and the misregulation of glycolysis related genes (TIGAR, G6PD, GLUT1) which are closely related to the regulation of glycolysis by p53. Inhibiting p53 by siRNA or inhibitor could significantly attenuate the upregulation of aerobic glycolysis induced by IC261. Finally, inhibition of aerobic glycolysis can further increase the cytotoxicity induced by IC261. Collectively, our results revealed that IC261 could inhibit the growth of colon cancer cells and increase the level of aerobic glycolysis, which is regulated by p53-dependent manner. This result suggested that targeting CK1δ/ε and glycolysis might be a valuable strategy treatment and combination therapies for colon cancer.
Keywords: colon cancer, casein kinase, aerobic glycolysis, IC261
In combination of both sexes, the colorectal cancer (CRC) ranks third in incidence and second in mortality worldwide [1]. CRC accounts for about one-tenth of all cancers, which seriously affects human health [2]. Although traditional treatment can improve the life span of patients, patients with CRC still show a high recurrence rate and mortality [3]. Over the past decade, with the advancement of precision medicine and the development of targeted drugs, more and more molecular targets have been found and studied in CRC [4].
Casein kinase 1 (CK1) is a family of ubiquitous serine/threonine protein kinases containing seven family members α, β, γ1, γ2, γ3, δ and ε [5]. Numerous studies have reported that CK1 kinase can regulate a variety of cellular biological behaviors, including DNA replication, differentiation, proliferation, membrane trafficking signal transduction and apoptosis [6-9].Based on these biological regulatory effects, it is not surprising that alterations and mutations in the expression of CK1 are involved in carcinogenesis [10, 11]. Some small molecule inhibitors have been synthesized to clarify the mechanism of CK1 and develop clinical targeted drugs [12]. Among these inhibitors, IC261 has been the most widely studied, which targets CK1δ and CK1ε [13, 14]. Few literatures have reported the relationship between CK1 family and colorectal cancer, however, the investigations only limited to the expression of CK1 in clinical tissue samples. The effect of IC261 on the biological behavior of colon cancer cells and the underlying mechanism are still unclear [15].
Glucose metabolic alteration is a hallmark of tumor cells. Unlike normal cells which obtain energy through mitochondrial respiration, tumor cells prefer to use glycolysis to obtain energy, even when oxygen is sufficient, known as Warburg effect or aerobic glycolysis [16, 17].Limited ability of glycolysis to obtain ATP promotes increased glucose uptake and utilization in tumor cells [18]. However, aerobic glycolysis of cancer cells can not only provide precursors for cell synthesis of biomacromolecules, but also produce a large number of antioxidants [19].Recent studies have shown that aerobic glycolysis of cancer cells plays an important role in malignant progression [20-22]. Targeting aerobic glycolysis has become a new direction of cancer control and treatment. Although many cancer-related genes are involved in the regulation of aerobic glycolysis, it is unknown whether CK1 is involved in this process.
In this research, we systematically explored the relationship between CK1δ/ε expression and clinical characteristics in colon cancer, and clarified the effect of CK1δ/ε inhibitors IC261 on biological behavior of colon cancer cells. Meanwhile, we examined the effects of IC261 on aerobic glycolysis of colon cancer cells and explored their possible mechanisms. To some extent, our study may provide a theoretical basis for CK1 inhibitor in the treatment of colon cancer and supply a strategy of combination therapy.
Fresh colon cancer tissues and matched adjacent normal tissues were obtained from patients at the Department of General Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University (Xinxiang City, Henan Province, China). Formalin- fixed paraffin-embedded colon cancer colon cancer samples were obtained from the Department of Pathology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University. All patients did not receive radiotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy before surgery. All patients were diagnosed with colon cancer by HE (Hematoxylin-Eosin) staining. The research was approved by the Medical Ethics Committees of Xinxiang Medical University.
The total RNAs from tissues and cultured cells were extracted with Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Then, the cDNAs were synthesized through reverse transcription (RT). The relative expression of CK1δ, CK1ε, GLUT1 (glucose transporter 1) were detected by Real Time PCR System (ABI7500, USA). The primer sequences were as follows: CK1δ (F:5'-GGATCCATGGAGCTGAGAGTCGGGAACAG-3', R:5'-GGATCCTCACGGTGCACGACAGACTGA-3'), CK1ε (F: 5'-ATGGAGTTGCGTGTTGGA-3', R: 5'-GTCAACATACAACACTTTCTG-3'), GLUT1 (F: 5'-ACCATTGGCTCCGGTATCG-3', R: 5'-GCTCGCTCCACCACAAACA-3'), GAPDH (F: 5'-AGAAGGCTGGGGCTCA TTTG-3', R: 5'-AGGGGCCATCCACAGTCTTC-3'). We used primer dilution to determine primer efficiency. The data were normalized to the housekeeping gene GAPDH and calculated as 2-ΔΔCT.
Paraffin-embedded colon cancer tissues were cut into 3 μm sections for IHC. Immunohistochemistry kits were purchased from Beyotime (China). The slides were incubated overnight at 4°C with CK1ε and CK1δ antibody (Cell Signaling Technology USA), followed by incubation with secondary antibodies (Abm, China). The slides were incubated with DAB (3, 3-diaminobenzidine) and counterstained with Hematoxylin. Two researchers judged the results based on staining intensity.
The human colon cancer cell lines RKO, LOVO, HCT116 and SW480 were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, USA). Cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 (Invitrogen, USA) with 10% FBS (fetal bovine serum, Gibco) at 37°C with a 5% CO2 atmosphere.
Colon cancer cells were treatment by IC261 (HY-12774, MedChemExpress, USA) alone or combination with 2-DG ( HY-13966, MedChemExpress, USA). For cell viability detection, colon cancer cells were plated in 96-well plates at a density of 1.2×104 cells/well in 200 μl complete medium. Cells were exposed to IC261 alone or combination with 2-DG for 24h. For cell proliferation detection, colon cancer cells were plated in 96-well plates at a density of 3×103 cells/well in 200 μl complete medium. Cells were exposed to IC261 alone or combination with 2-DG and detected at 0h, 24h, 48h, 72h. Each treatment was repeated in six separate wells (n=6), 10 μl Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assay (Dojindo, Japan) was added to each well and the plates were incubated additional for 2 h at the end of the experiments. Optical Density (OD) at a wave length of 450 nm was measured.
Colon cancer cells were plated in 6-well plates, the cells were incubated at 37 ℃with 5% CO2, Cells were added with different concentrations of inhibitors for apoptosis induction, cell apoptosis was evaluated using an Annexin V-FITC staining method according to the manufacturer's instructions (Dojindo, Japan). After cells were cultured with 20h, the culture medium was collected, and cells were washed with phosphate buffered solution (PBS) 3 times. Subsequently, cells in each group were incubated with 200 μL Annexin V-FITC binding buffer, 5 μL Annexin V-FITC, and 5μL propidium iodide (PI) with agitation. Then, the cells were stained for 20 minutes at room temperature in a dark room. Finally, quantifcation analysis of apoptotic cells was performed by flow cytometry (CytoFLEX, USA).
Colon cancer cells were added with IC261 alone or combination with 2-DG. After cells were cultured with 20h, the total protein was extracted. And then protein concentrations were determined using the BCA protein assay (Beyotime, China). For western blotting analysis, equivalent amounts of protein (30 μg) were separated by 10% (w/v) SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred onto PVDF membranes (Bio-Rad, CA). The membranes were blocked with 5% (w/v) skim milk in buffer for 2h at room temperature and then incubated with primary antibodies (cleaved caspase-3, p53, TIGAR, G6PD were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology USA; Tublin was purchased from Sigma USA) overnight at 4℃, followed by incubation with secondary antibodies (Abm, China) at room temperature for 1h. Data were collected using a chemiluminescence imaging system (vilber, France) and image J softwire for quantitative analysis.
Human Glucose Metabolism RT2 Profiler™ PCR Array kit was purchased from QIAGE (Germany) and operated following the instructions. Breifly, The total RNAs were extracted with QIAGE reagent according to the manufacturer's protocol. Then, the cDNAs were synthesized through reverse transcription (RT). The kit contains 84 key genes in glucose metabolism and determined by quantitative PCR using the Real Time PCR System (ABI7500, USA). The relatived expression of the 84 genes was presented using heat imaging with normalization to β-actin.
After treatment, the cell culture medium was collected. Glucose uptake was detected Glucose Assay Kit (Rsbio, China) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Briefly, glucose uptake is equal to the total amount of glucose in the medium minus the final glucose content in the cell culture medium. Lactate production was detected by Lactate Production Detection kit (KeyGen, China) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The results were counted by analyzing the difference of absorbance values (530nm).
The siRNA against p53 were designed. The double-stranded sequences were: 5′AAGACUCCAGUGGUAAUCUAC-dTdT3′ (sense) and 5′GUAGAUUACCACUGGAGUCUU-dTdT3′ (anti-sense). Transfections were carried out by lipofectamine 3000 reagent (Invitrogen, USA). After 36h, colon cells were used for experiment.
SPSS 18.0 was used for statistical analysis. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for three or more groups followed by t-tests. Rate comparison using chi-square test. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Comparisons were considered to be statistically significant difference when P <0.05.
In order to explore the expression of CK1ε and CK1δ in colon cancer and its clinical significance, we first detected CK1ε and CK1δ mRNA expression in 45 colon cacner and paired adjacent normal tissues using qRT-PCR. Compared with normal tissues, the expression level of CK1ε and CK1δ in colon cancer tissues increased significantly (Figure 1A and 1B). The expression of CK1ε and CK1δ protein in colon cancer tissues was further detected by IHC. The result showed that CK1ε and CK1δ were mainly expressed in the cytoplasm and the expression of CK1 protein was upregulated in cancer tissues (Figure 1C and 1D). Analysis of protein results indicated that CK1ε and CK1δ protein expression level was correlated with TNM classification and differentiation (Table 1 and 2). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the patients with high CK1ε and CK1δ expression had significantly poorer overall survival than the patients with low CK1ε and CK1δ (Figure 1E and 1F). Together, these results suggested that CK1ε and CK1δ are highly expressed in colon cancer, which is significantly associated with advanced progression and poor prognosis.
Based on the above results, we used CK1ε/δ-specific inhibitor IC261 to investigate the effects of CK1ε and CK1δ on survival, proliferation and apoptosis of colon cancer cells. Four colon cancer cell lines (RKO, LOVO, HCT116 and SW480) were selected and given IC261 at different concentrations. The results showed that IC261 could significantly reduce the cell viability and proliferation (Figure 2). We further examined the effect of IC261 on apoptosis of colon cancer cells. The results showed that IC261 could significantly increase the apoptotic rate and cleaved caspase-3 expression (Figure 3). To sum up, these data revealed that IC261 can induce obvious cytotoxicity of colon cancer cells.
Correlation between the clinicopathological features and CK1ε expression
Characteristics | N | CK1ε expression | P | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Low | High | |||
Gender | 0.322 | |||
Male | 72 | 28 | 44 | |
Female | 77 | 37 | 40 | |
Age | 0.566 | |||
≥55 | 94 | 41 | 53 | |
< 55 | 55 | 24 | 31 | |
T stage | 0.003** | |||
T1-T2 | 68 | 39 | 29 | |
T3-T4 | 81 | 26 | 55 | |
N stage | 0.012* | |||
Nx-0 | 62 | 35 | 27 | |
N1-2 | 87 | 30 | 57 | |
M stage | 0.001** | |||
M0 | 68 | 40 | 28 | |
M1 | 81 | 25 | 56 | |
Differentiation | 0.002** | |||
Well | 51 | 32 | 19 | |
Moderately | 45 | 17 | 28 | |
Poorly | 53 | 16 | 37 |
CK1ε and CK1δ are upregulated in colon cancer and associated with poor clinical outcome. (A, B) CK1ε and CK1δ mRNA were detected in colon cancer and paired adjacent normal tissues by using qRT-PCR. (C, D) CK1ε and CK1δ proteins were detected in colon cancer and paired adjacent normal tissues by using IHC. (E) Kaplan-Meier analysis of the CK1ε and CK1δ expression on overall survival of colon cancer patients (**p<0.01).
IC261 inhibited the survival and proliferation of colon cancer cells. (A-D) Cell viability of RKO, LOVO, HCT116 and SW480 was detected by MTT assay. (C, D) Cell proliferation of RKO, LOVO, HCT116 and SW480 was detected by MTT assay (*p<0.05, **p<0.01 vs 0 nM group).
Correlation between the clinicopathological features and CK1δ expression
Characteristics | N | CK1δ expression | P | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Low | High | |||
Gender | 0.65 | |||
Male | 89 | 39 | 50 | |
Female | 91 | 36 | 55 | |
Age | 0.642 | |||
≥55 | 112 | 45 | 67 | |
< 55 | 68 | 30 | 38 | |
T stage | 0.015* | |||
T1-T2 | 81 | 42 | 39 | |
T3-T4 | 99 | 33 | 66 | |
N stage | 0.007** | |||
Nx-0 | 86 | 45 | 41 | |
N1-2 | 94 | 30 | 64 | |
M stage | 0.015* | |||
M0 | 90 | 46 | 44 | |
M1 | 90 | 29 | 61 | |
Differentiation | 0.001** | |||
Well | 56 | 35 | 21 | |
Moderately | 59 | 20 | 39 | |
Poorly | 65 | 20 | 45 |
Unlike normal cells, cancer cells gain energy preferentially through aerobic glycolysis, known as the Warburg effect. We then investigated whether IC261 can affect aerobic glycolysis in colon cancer cells. The RT2 Human Glucose Metabolism Profiler PCR array was used to explore the effect of IC261 on colon cancer cells RKO and HCT116. The results showed that the glycolysis-related genes PGM2, PDK1, PGK1, HK2 and G6PD increased in both cell lines when IC261 was administrated,. On the contrary, the expression level of TCA cycle related IDH1, DLAT and PDHA1 decreased (Figure 4A-C). Next, we detected the glucose uptake and the lactate production in RKO and HCT116 cells treated by IC261. As shown in Fig. 4D and E, IC261 can significantly increase cell glucose uptake and lactate production. These results suggest that IC261 can increase the level of aerobic glycolysis in colon cancer cells.
IC261 induced apoptosis of colon cancer cells. (A, B) Apoptotic rate of RKO and HCT116 induced by IC261 were detected by flow cytometry. (C, D) The expression of cleaved caspase-3 of RKO and HCT116 induced by IC261 was detected by using Western blotting (*p<0.05, **p<0.01 vs 0 nM group).
As a transcription factor, p53 has been shown to be involved in regulating cancer cell metabolism in recent years [23]. We further clarified whether IC261 regulates aerobic glycolysis in colon cancer cells through p53. We selected three genes TIGAR (TP53-induced glycolysis and apoptosis regulator) [24], G6PD (glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase) [25] and GLUT1 (glucose transporter 1) [26], which are closely related to the regulation of cancer cell metabolism by p53. The results showed that IC261 could significantly reduce the expression of p53 and TIGAR proteins and increase the expression of G6PD protein in RKO and HCT116 cells (Figure 5A-D).As shown in Fig. 5E and F, IC261 could significantly the expression of GLUT1 mRNA. To further clarify the role of p53 in the regulation of aerobic glycolysis in colon cancer cells by IC261, we constructed p53 siRNA. The results showed that inhibiting p53 could significantly reduce the expression of TIGAR and increase the expression of G6PD (Figure 6A and 6B). The combination of p53 siRNA could significantly alleviate the increase of glucose uptake and lactate production in colon cancer cells induced by IC261 (Figure 6C and 6D). In addition, we used p53 inhibitors Pifithrin-α. The results showed that Pifithrin-α could significantly reduce the increase of aerobic glycolysis induced by IC261 in colon cancer cells (Figure 6E and 6F). These results suggested that IC261 may affect the aerobic glycolysis level of colon cancer cells by regulating P53 expression.
To clarify the role of aerobic glycolysis in IC261-induced cytotoxicity of colon cancer, glycolysis inhibitor 2-DG was used. The results showed that 2-DG could further reduce the cell survival and proliferation inhibition induced by IC261 (Figure 7A-C). Further results showed that the combination of 2-DG could aggravate the apoptosis of colon cancer cells induced by IC261 (Figure 7D-G). These results indicated that cell aerobic glycolysis may play a protective role in IC261-induced cytotoxicity.
IC261 increased the level of aerobic glycolysis in colon cancer cells. (A, B) Glucose metabolism in RKO and HCT116 treatment with IC261 was examined by PCR array. (C) The list of glucose metabolism gene was provided by RT2 Human Glucose Metabolism Profiler PCR array. (D) Glucose uptake was measured in RKO and HCT116 treated with IC261. (E) Lactate production was measured in RKO and HCT116 treated with IC261 (*p<0.05 vs 0 nM group).
CK1ε and CK1δ, showed the highest homology, are closely related isoforms of CK1 which is highly conserved in the kinase domain [10]. It is reported that they play an important role in the regulation of various cellular biological behaviors, especially in cancer [9, 27]. Studies have shown that CK1ε can affect the proliferation of breast cancer cells by regulating the mRNA translation process [28]. CK1δ participates in the degradation of Brg1 protein in gastric cancer cells and regulates metastasis [29]. Our results showed that the expression of CK1ε and CK1δ were significantly increased either at the level of mRNA or protein in colon cancer tissues. The upregulation of CK1ε and CK1δ were closely correlated with the poor differentiation, advanced TNM stage and poor prognosis of colon cancer. These results suggest that CK1ε and CK1δ may be involved in the development of colon cancer, and targeting CK1ε and CK1δ may affect the biological behavior of colon cancer cells.
IC261 is a selective ATP-competitive inhibitor of CK1ε/δ with less effect on CK1a [30]. It has been reported that IC261 is involved in the regulation of tumor cell survival and proliferation [14, 31-33]. However, the effect of IC261 on the biological behavior of colon cancer cells remains unknown. Four colon cancer cell lines were selected and treated with IC261. The results showed that IC261 could significantly reduce the survival and proliferation of colon cancer cells. Meanwhile IC261 can increase the apoptotic level of colon cancer cells.
In recent years, more and more researches demonstrated that aerobic glycolysis plays a pivotal role in the development of colon cancer and in the treatment of colon cancer by using anticancer agent [34-36]. However, it is not clear whether IC261 are involved in the regulation of aerobic glycolysis in colon cancer cells. Our investigations showed that IC261 increased glycolysis-related genes and decreased the TCA cycle related genes. In addition, IC261 can significantly increase cell glucose uptake and lactate production, suggesting that the level of aerobic glycolysis increased. Although we have revealed the role of IC261 in the aerobic glycolysis, the underlying mechanism is unknown.
IC261 regulated the glycolysis related proteins and gene of colon cancer cells. (A, C) The expression of p53, TIGAR and G6PD of RKO and HCT116 induced by IC261 was detected by using Western blotting. (B, D) Quantitive analysis of A and C. (E, F) GLUT1 mRNA expression in colon cancer treated with IC261 was detected by using qRT-PCR (*p<0.05, **p<0.01 vs 0 nM group).
IC261 modulates aerobic glycolysis in colon cancer cells through p53-dependent mechanism. (A, B) The expression of p53, TIGAR and G6PD of RKO and HCT116 in NC and p53 siRNA group was detected by using Western blotting. (C) Glucose uptake was measured in RKO and HCT116 treated by IC261 with NC or p53 siRNA. (D) Lactate production was measured in RKO and HCT116 treated by IC261 with NC or p53 siRNA. (E) Glucose uptake was measured in RKO and HCT116 treated by IC261 with or without p53 inhibitor Pifithrin-α. (F) Lactate production was measured in RKO and HCT116 treated by IC261 with or without p53 inhibitor Pifithrin-α (*p<0.05 vs control group, &p<0.05 vs IC261 group).
Inhibition of aerobic glycolysis increased the cytotoxicity induced by IC261 in colon cancer cells. (A) The cell viability was measured in RKO and HCT116 treated by IC261(80 μM) with or without aerobic glycolysis inhibitor 2-DG (2 mM). (B, C) The cell proliferation was measured in RKO and HCT116 treated by IC261 with or without 2-DG. (D, E) Apoptotic rate of RKO and HCT116 treated by IC261 with or without 2-DG was detected by using flow cytometry. (F, G) The expression of cleaved caspase-3 of RKO and HCT116 treated by IC261 with or without 2-DG was detected by using Western blotting (*p<0.05 vs control group, &p<0.05 vs IC261 group).
CK1 family members play an important role in DNA damage regulation [37]. Interestingly, P53 activation ensures genomic stability [38,39]. This signaling network makes CK1 associated with p53 [40]. It has been reported that CK1ε and CK1δ, including CK1a, can phosphorylate p53 at different sites (Ser-6, Ser-9, Ser-15 and Ser-20) [41-44]. The modification of p53 by CK1ε and CK1δ can reduce its binding with MDM2 (Mouse double-minute 2 homolog) and activate p53 [45]. In addition, CK1δ can phosphorylate MDM2, reduce its interaction with p53, and further stabilize and activate p53 [46].However, the effect of CK1ε/δ inhibitors IC261 on the expression of p53 in colon cancer cells remains unclear.Our results show that IC261 can significantly reduce the level of p53 protein in colon cancer cells.
As a transcription factor and tumor-suppressor, p53 participates in the regulation of cellular biological behavior by targeting a variety of genes, including cell growth, cycle and apoptosis [47]. Recent studies have shown that p53 can also participate in the regulation of tumor cell metabolism, especially glucose metabolism [23]. P53 is involved in the regulation of aerobic glycolysis in cancer cells by regulating various metabolic related genes. It was reported that p53 inhibited glycolysis by regulating TIGAR (TP53-induced glycolysis and apoptosis regulator) expression [24]. p53 inhibits glycolytic intermediates into the PPP (pentose phosphate pathway) by binding to G6PD (glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase) and inhibiting its activity [48]. In addition, p53 reduces glucose uptake by inhibiting GLUT1 and GLUT4 (glucose transporter 4) levels at the transcriptional level [26]. Our results showed that IC261 could decrease the protein expression of TIGAR and increase the protein expression of G6PD in colon cancer cells. Meanwhile, IC261 can increase the mRNA expression of GLUT1. To further clarify the role of p53 in the regulation of aerobic glycolysis in colon cancer cells by IC261, we used p53 siRNA and inhibitors, and found that inhibition of p53 could reduce the aerobic glycolysis induced by IC261. To investigate the role of aerobic glycolysis in IC261-induced colon cancer cell death and apoptosis, we combined IC261 and 2-DG, an inhibitor of aerobic glycolysis. The results showed that combined application could further increase the cytotoxicity induced by IC261, suggesting that aerobic glycolysis played a protective role in IC261-induced cell death.
In conclusion, we demonstrated that CK1ε and CK1δ are highly expressed in colon cancer tissues and are closely related to clinical significance. CK1δ/ε inhibitors IC261 increased of the cytotoxicity and aerobic glycolysis of colon cancer cells. IC261 induced aerobic glycolysis in colon cancer cells is p53-dependent pathway. Inhibition of aerobic glycolysis can further increase the cytotoxicity induced by IC261. The study may provide a new scheme and combined drug strategy for clinical treatment of colon cancer.
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.81702891 and U1804173), Zhongyuan Qianren Jihua of Henan Province (No.ZYQR201810153), Science and Technology Program foundation of Henan Province, China (No.172102310651), Scientific Research Foundation of the Higher Education Institutions of Henan Province, China (No. 17A310023 and 20A310011), Taihang Young Scholar Foundation of Xinxiang Medical University (No. 505079), Henan Provincial Medical Science and Technology Research Project (SB201901064t). This research was supported by Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Tumor Reversal (Xinxiang Medical University).
The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.
1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69:7-34
2. Peng Z, Ruidong L, Hua X. et al. BRD4 Inhibitor AZD5153 Suppresses the Proliferation of Colorectal Cancer Cells and Sensitizes the Anticancer Effect of PARP Inhibitor. Int J Biol Sci. 2019;15:1942-54
3. Weinberg BA, Marshall JL, Salem ME. The Growing Challenge of Young Adults With Colorectal Cancer. Oncology (Williston Park). 2017;31:381-9
4. Taieb J, André T, Auclin E. Refining adjuvant therapy for non-metastatic colon cancer, new standards and perspectives. Cancer Treat Rev. 2019;75:1-11
5. Cheong JK, Virshup DM. Casein kinase 1: Complexity in the family. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2011;43:465-9
6. Schittek B, Sinnberg T. Biological functions of casein kinase 1 isoforms and putative roles in tumorigenesis. Mol Cancer. 2014;13:231
7. Cruciat CM. Casein kinase 1 and Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2014;31:46-55
8. Su Z, Song J, Wang Z. et al. Tumor promoter TPA activates Wnt/β-catenin signaling in a casein kinase 1-dependent manner. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115:E7522-31
9. Narasimamurthy R, Hunt SR, Lu Y. et al. CK1δ/ε protein kinase primes the PER2 circadian phosphoswitch. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115:5986-991
10. Knippschild U, Krüger M, Richter J. et al. The CK1 Family: Contribution to Cellular Stress Response and Its Role in Carcinogenesis. Front Oncol. 2014;4:96
11. Jiang J. CK1 in Developmental Signaling: Hedgehog and Wnt. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2017;123:303-29
12. Brockschmidt C, Hirner H, Huber N. et al. Anti-apoptotic and growth-stimulatory functions of CK1 delta and epsilon in ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas are inhibited by IC261 in vitro and in vivo. Gut. 2008;57:799-806
13. Föhr KJ, Knippschild U, Herkommer A. et al. State-dependent block of voltage-gated sodium channels by the casein-kinase 1 inhibitor IC261. Invest New Drugs. 2017;35:277-89
14. Cheong JK, Nguyen TH, Wang H. et al. IC261 induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis of human cancer cells via CK1δ/ɛ and Wnt/β-catenin independent inhibition of mitotic spindle formation. Oncogene. 2011;30:2558-69
15. Richter J, Kretz AL, Lemke J. et al. CK1α overexpression correlates with poor survival in colorectal cancer. BMC Cancer. 2018;18:140
16. Orang AV, Petersen J, McKinnon RA, Michael MZ. Micromanaging aerobic respiration and glycolysis in cancer cells. Mol Metab. 2019;23:98-126
17. Ganapathy-Kanniappan S. Molecular intricacies of aerobic glycolysis in cancer: current insights into the classic metabolic phenotype. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2018;53:667-82
18. Ganapathy-Kanniappan S. Taming Tumor Glycolysis and Potential Implications for Immunotherapy. Front Oncol. 2017;7:36
19. Lunt SY, Vander Heiden MG. Aerobic glycolysis: meeting the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2011;27:441-64
20. Chen F, Chen J, Yang L. et al. Extracellular vesicle-packaged HIF-1α- stabilizing lncRNA from tumour-associated macrophages regulates aerobic glycolysis of breast cancer cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2019;21:498-510
21. Wu G, Yuan S, Chen Z. et al. The KLF14 Transcription Factor Regulates Glycolysis by Downregulating LDHB in Colorectal Cancer. Int J Biol Sci. 2019;15:628-35
22. Yang Y, Ishak Gabra MB, Hanse EA. et al. MiR-135 suppresses glycolysis and promotes pancreatic cancer cell adaptation to metabolic stress by targeting phosphofructokinase-1. Nat Commun. 2019;10:809
23. Liu J, Zhang C, Hu W, Feng Z. Tumor suppressor p53 and its mutants in cancer metabolism. Cancer Lett. 2015;356:197-203
24. Bensaad K, Tsuruta A, Selak MA. et al. TIGAR, a p53-inducible regulator of glycolysis and apoptosis. Cell. 2006;126:107-20
25. Zhang X, Zhang X, Li Y. et al. PAK4 regulates G6PD activity by p53 degradation involving colon cancer cell growth. Cell Death Dis. 2017;8:e2820
26. Schwartzenberg-Bar-Yoseph F, Armoni M, Karnieli E. The Tumor Suppressor p53 Down-Regulates Glucose Transporters GLUT1 and GLUT4 Gene Expression. Cancer Res. 2004;64:2627-33
27. Deng C, Lipstein MR, Scotto L. et al. Silencing c-Myc translation as a therapeutic strategy through targeting PI3Kδ and CK1ε in hematological malignancies. Blood. 2017;129:88-99
28. Shin S, Wolgamott L, Roux PP, Yoon SO. Casein kinase 1ε promotes cell proliferation by regulating mRNA translation. Cancer Res. 2014Jan1;74(1):201-11
29. Huang LY, Zhao J, Chen H. et al. SCFFBW7-mediated degradation of Brg1 suppresses gastric cancer metastasis. Nat Commun. 2018;9:3569
30. Behrend L, Milne DM, Stoter M. et al. IC261, a specific inhibitor of the protein kinases casein kinase 1-delta and -epsilon, triggers the mitotic checkpoint and induces p53-dependent postmitotic effects. Oncogene. 2000;19:5303-13
31. Varghese RT, Young S, Pham L. et al. Casein Kinase 1 Epsilon Regulates Glioblastoma Cell Survival. Sci Rep. 2018;8:13621
32. Greer YE, Rubin JS. Casein kinase 1 delta functions at the centrosome to mediate Wnt-3a-dependent neurite outgrowth. J Cell Biol. 2011;192:993-1004
33. Kim SY, Dunn IF, Firestein R. et al. CK1 epsilon is required for breast cancers dependent on beta-catenin activity. PLoS One. 2010;5:e8979
34. Zhao Z, Wang L, Bartom E. et al. β-Catenin/ Tcf7l2-dependent transcriptional regulation of GLUT1 gene expression by Zic family proteins in colon cancer. Sci Adv. 2019;5:eaax0698
35. Kwak CH, Lee JH, Kim EY. et al. Huzhangoside A Suppresses Tumor Growth through Inhibition of Pyruvate Dehydrogenase Kinase Activity. Cancers (Basel). 2019;11:E712
36. Graziano F, Ruzzo A, Giacomini E. et al. Glycolysis gene expression analysis and selective metabolic advantage in the clinical progression of colorectal cancer. Pharmacogenomics J. 2017;17:258-64
37. Knippschild U, Gocht A, Wolff S, Huber N, Lohler J, Stoter M. The casein kinase 1 family: participation in multiple cellular processes in eukaryotes. Cell Signal. 2005;17:675-89
38. Meek DW. The role of p53 in the response to mitotic spindle damage. Pathol Biol (Paris). 2000;48:246-54
39. Tarapore P, Fukasawa K. Loss of p53 and centrosome hyperamplification. Oncogene. 2002;21:6234-40
40. Knippschild U, Milne DM, Campbell LE. et al. p53 is phosphorylated in vitro and in vivo by the delta and epsilon isoforms of casein kinase 1 and enhances the level of casein kinase 1 delta in response to topoisomerase-directed drugs. Oncogene. 1997;15:1727-36
41. Dumaz N, Milne DM, Meek DW. Protein kinase CK1 is a p53-threonine 18 kinase which requires prior phosphorylation of serine 15. FEBS Lett. 1999;463:312-6
42. Knippschild U, Milne D, Campbell L, Meek D. p53 N-terminus-targeted protein kinase activity is stimulated in response to wild type p53 and DNAdamage. Oncogene. 1996;13:1387-93
43. MacLaine NJ, Oster B, Bundgaard B. et al. A central role for CK1 in catalyzing phosphorylation of the p53 transactivation domain at serine 20 after HHV-6B viral infection. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:28563-73
44. Venerando A, Marin O, Cozza G, Bustos VH, Sarno S, Pinna LA. Isoform specific phosphorylation of p53 by protein kinase CK1. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2010;67:1105-18
45. Kulikov R, Winter M, Blattner C. Binding of p53 to the central domain of Mdm2 is regulated by phosphorylation. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:28575-83
46. Winter M, Milne D, Dias S, Kulikov R, Knippschild U, Blattner C. et al. Protein kinase CK1δ phosphorylates key sites in the acidic domain of murine double-minute clone 2 protein (MDM2) that regulate p53 turnover. Biochemistry. 2004;43:16356-64
47. Bykov VJN, Eriksson SE, Bianchi J, Wiman KG. Targeting mutant p53 for efficient cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2018;18:89-102
48. Jiang P, Du W, Wang X, Mancuso A, Gao X, Wu M, Yang X. p53 regulates biosynthesis through direct inactivation of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase. Nat Cell Biol. 2011;13:310-16
Corresponding authors: Feng Ren, 601 Jinsui Avenue Xinxiang, Henan 453003, China. Email: renfengedu.cn and Jiateng Zhong, 601 Jinsui Avenue Xinxiang, Henan 453003, China. Email: jtzhongedu.cn.
Received 2019-10-7
Accepted 2019-11-22
Published 2020-1-17